Notes |
"The evidence... suggests that Margery married Giles before 1239 andlived until 1267, when Giles is mentioned, but was probably dead byc.1274, when her son Reginald appears (there is no doubt that Reginaldwas of age by 1267). Judging by Jordan de Sackville's OxfordshireInquisition Post Mortem, and others quoted by Phillips, his son Andrewwas born 9 October 1253, at which date Margery was certainly married toGiles de Argentein. Andrew de Sackville does not appear in connectionwith the property until c.1282 (although Blomefield (vol.2, pp.181,183;vol.8, pp.412,413) gives some references vaguely dated 'temp.Henry III',in fact they must be later). The later records quoted by Phillips must bein error (Andrew perhaps being changed from 'successor' of Margery intoher 'heir').
One other feature of Margery's (who married Giles de Argentein) ancestrydisclosed by the evidence above is that her mother was Margery, thedaughter of William de Fresney, and not, as usually stated, Agatha, thedaughter and coheir of Fulk de Beaufo (Blomefield, vol.2, p.178, vol.8,pp 412,413; Farrer, vol.3, p.111). Note that Phillips makes this Agathathe mother, not the wife, of Robert Aguillon, which would resolve theproblem.
Blomefield = F.Blomefield, An Essay Towards a Topographical History ofthe County of Norfolk; continued by C.Parkin (2nd edn, 1805-10).
Farrer = W.Farrer, Honors and Knights' Fees (1923).
Phillips = C.J.Phillips, History of the Sackville Family (1929), vol.1,p.61." [Ref: The marriage of Giles de Argentein to Margery, daughter ofRobert Aguillonhttp://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/families/arg/argbiog.shtml]
----------------------
----------------------
|